BETH ANN FARAGHER, PETITIONER v. CITY OF BOCA RATON Case Study

BETH ANN FARAGHER, PETITIONER v. CITY OF BOCA RATON - eluding Study ExampleThis therefore puts them in a positioning that they idler abuse by practising acts that can be termed as abusive and therefore call for legal intervention.In our case the city is claimed to be unaware of the actions of two of its employees-terry cloth and Silverman who were sued for subjecting the petitioner-Faragher and other female lifeguards to the unwelcome and uninvited touches and abusive language that they were using. Among the allegations, Terry had verbalize that he would never promote a woman to the rank of a Lieutenant and in some other occasion, Silverman had warned Faragher that she should date him or she would clean the toilets for a year (Legal Information Institute).Silverman being in a position to allocate duties to the lifeguards, had the power to execute that threat. This therefore calls for the intervention of the law as the powers he uses are bestowed to him by the agency that has hir ed him and set him to the rank that he is in.The United States territorial dominion Court for the Southern District of Florida handled the case where Faragher had sued the city. It established that during the time that that Faragher was working with the city, Terry was serving as the Chief of the Marine pencil eraser division and he had authority to supervise all aspects of the life guards assignments, engage in counselling and set up oral reprimands while putting into record such an occurrence. At that moment, Silverman was serving in the position of ocean safety lieutenant. The city had a sexual harassment policy that was drafted on February 1986. This was revised in 1990 and a restatement reissued. However, Terry, Silverman and Gordon were unaware of it. This put the responsibility of their actions at an individual level as the city had already drafted a policy in regard to sexual harassment.The court made a conclusion that the conduct of Terry and Silverman could be cause a hostile working environment for Faragher. The court therefore